Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/MR and PET/CT preliminarily for the thoracic staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a special focus on pleural invasion evaluation. MethodsFifty-two patients with pathologically confirmed NSCLC were included and followed for another year. Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT and subsequent thoracic PET/MR were performed for initial thoracic staging. Thoracic (simultaneous) PET/MR acquired PET images and MRI sequences including T2 weighted imaging, with and without fat saturation, T1 weighted imaging, and diffusion weighted imaging. Two radiologists independently assessed the thoracic T, N staging and pleural involvement. The McNemar Chi-square test was used to compare the differences between PET/CT and PET/MR in the criteria. The area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curves (AUC) was calculated. ResultsCompared to PET/CT, PET/MR exhibited higher sensitivity, specificity in the detection of pleural invasion; 82% vs. 64% (P=.625), 98% vs. 95% (P=1.000), PET/MR to PET/CT, respectively. The receiver-operating-characteristic analysis results of PET/CT vs. PET/MR for the pleural invasion were as follow: AUCPET/CT=0.79, AUCPET/MR=0.90, P=.21. Both T staging results and N staging results were approximately identical in PET/CT and PET/MR. Differences between PET/CT and PET/MR in T staging, N staging as well as pleural invasion accuracy were not statistically significant (P>.05, each). ConclusionPET/MR and PET/CT demonstrated equivalent performance about the evaluation of preoperative thoracic staging of NSCLC patients. PET/MR may have greater potential in pleural invasion evaluation for NSCLC, especially for solid nodules, crucial to clinical decision-making, though our results did not demonstrate statistical significance.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call