Abstract

BackgroundHormone receptor status and HER2 status are of critical interest in determining the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Their status is routinely assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, it is subject to intra-laboratory and inter-laboratory variability. The aim of our study was to compare the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 status as determined by the MapQuant™ test to the routine immuno-histochemical tests in early stage invasive breast cancer in a large comprehensive cancer center.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively studied 163 invasive early-stage breast carcinoma with standard IHC status. The genomic status was determined using the MapQuant™ test providing the genomic grade index.ResultsWe found only 4 tumours out of 161 (2.5%) with discrepant IHC and genomic results concerning ER status. The concordance rate between the two methods was 97.5% and the Cohen’s Kappa coefficient was 0.89.Comparison between the MapQuant™ PR status and the PR IHC status gave more discrepancies. The concordance rate between the two methods was 91.4% and the Cohen’s Kappa coefficient was 0.74.The HER2 MapQuant™ test was classified as « undetermined » in 2 out of 163 cases (1.2%). One HER2 IHC-negative tumour was found positive with a high HER2 MapQuant™ genomic score. The concordance rate between the two methods was 99.3% and the Cohen’s Kappa coefficient was 0.86.ConclusionOur results show that the MapQuant™ assay, based on mRNA expression assay, provides an objective and quantitative assessment of Estrogen receptor, Progesterone receptor and HER2 status in invasive breast cancer.

Highlights

  • We found only 4 tumours out of 161 (2.5%) with discrepant IHC and genomic results concerning Estrogen Receptor (ER) status

  • One HER2 IHC-negative tumour was found positive with a high HER2 MapQuantTM

  • Our results show that the MapQuantTM assay, based on mRNA expression assay, provides an objective and quantitative assessment of Estrogen receptor, Progesterone receptor and HER2 status in invasive breast cancer

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Estrogen Receptor (ER) and Progesterone Receptor (PR) status are of critical interest in determining the prognosis of breast cancer patients and the potential benefit of adjuvant hormonal therapy. The larger study driven by Viale [5] comparing central versus local assessment of IHC hormone status (with a 10% cut-off for positivity), revealed a reclassification (after central reviewing) of 69.5% and 1.1% of the ER-negative and ER-positive tumours, and of 44.5% and 4.6% of PR-negative and PR-positive tumours. They concluded that central IHC should be performed whenever possible to correct the influence of the laboratory where the assay has been performed. Hormone receptor status and HER2 status are of critical interest in determining the prognosis of breast cancer patients Their status is routinely assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The aim of our study was to compare the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 status as determined by the MapQuantTM test to the routine immuno-histochemical tests in early stage invasive breast cancer in a large comprehensive cancer center

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.