Estrogenic impregnation alters pain expression: analysis through functional neuropeptidomics in a surgical rat model of osteoarthritis.

Abstract

Several observational studies suggest that estrogens could bias pain perception. To evaluate the influence of estrogenic impregnation on pain expression, a prospective, randomized, controlled, blinded study was conducted in a Sprague-Dawley rat model of surgically induced osteoarthritis (OA). Female rats were ovariectomized and pre-emptive 17β-estradiol (0.025mg, 90-day release time) or placebo pellets were installed subcutaneously during the OVX procedures. Thirty-five days after, OA was surgically induced on both 17β-estradiol (OA-E) and placebo (OA-P) groups. Mechanical hypersensitivity was assessed by static weight-bearing (SWB) and paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) tests. Mass spectrometry coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC-MS) was performed to quantify the spinal pronociceptive neuropeptides substance P (SP), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), bradykinin (BK), somatostatin (SST), and dynorphin-A (Dyn-A). Compared to control, ovariectomized rats presented higher SP (P = 0.009) and CGRP (P = 0.017) concentrations. OA induction increased the spinal level of SP (+ 33%, P < 0.020) and decreased the release of BK (- 20%, (P < 0.037)). The OA-E rats at functional assessment put more % body weight on the affected hind limb than OA-P rats at D7 (P = 0.027) and D56 (P = 0.033), and showed higher PWT at D56 (P = 0.009), suggesting an analgesic and anti-allodynic effect of 17β-estradiol. Interestingly, the 17β-estradiol treatment counteracted the increase of spinal concentration of Dyn-A (P < 0.016) and CGRP (P < 0.018). These results clearly indicate that 17β-estradiol interfers with the development of central sensitization and confirm that gender dimorphism should be considered when looking at pain evaluation.