Abstract

Immunohistochemically ER-positive HER2-negative (ER+HER2−) breast cancers are classified clinically as Luminal-type. We showed previously that molecular subtyping using the 80-gene signature (80-GS) reclassified a subset of ER+HER2− tumors to molecular Basal-type. We report here that molecular reclassification is associated with expression of dominant-negative ER variants and evaluate response to neoadjuvant therapy and outcome in the prospective neoadjuvant NBRST study (NCT01479101). The 80-GS reclassified 91 of 694 (13.1%) immunohistochemically Luminal-type tumors to molecular Basal-type. Importantly, all 91 discordant tumors were classified as high-risk, whereas only 66.9% of ER+/Luminal-type tumors were classified at high-risk for disease recurrence (i.e., Luminal B) (P < 0.001). ER variant mRNA (ER∆3, ER∆7, and ERα-36) analysis performed on 84 ER+/Basal tumors and 48 ER+/Luminal B control tumors revealed that total ER mRNA was significantly lower in ER+/Basal tumors. The relative expression of ER∆7/total ER was significantly higher in ER+/Basal tumors compared to ER+/Luminal B tumors (P < 0.001). ER+/Basal patients had similar pathological complete response (pCR) rates following neoadjuvant chemotherapy as ER−/Basal patients (34.3 vs. 37.6%), and much higher than ER+/Luminal A or B patients (2.3 and 5.8%, respectively). Furthermore, 3-year distant metastasis-free interval (DMFI) for ER+/Basal patients was 65.8%, significantly lower than 96.3 and 88.9% for ER+/Luminal A and B patients, respectively, (log-rank P < 0.001). Significantly lower total ER mRNA and increased relative ER∆7 dominant-negative variant expression provides a rationale why ER+/Basal breast cancers are molecularly ER-negative. Identification of this substantial subset of patients is clinically relevant because of the higher pCR rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and correlation with clinical outcome.

Highlights

  • Diagnostic testing of breast cancers for hormone receptor (HR)and HER2 status by immunohistochemistry and/or in-situ hybridization is routinely performed as an integral step to clinically define tumor characteristics and predict tumor behavior.[1,2] Advancement of technology has made it possible to molecularly characterize these tumors at the genomic level by evaluating underlying and intrinsic differences in tumor biology.[3,4] clinical subtypes overlap with these molecular subtypes, a significant number of patients will be reclassified based on the functionality of molecular pathways.[5,6] This reclassification may have important consequences for treatment allocation, response and clinical outcome

  • We have shown previously in a small case-control study that estrogen receptor (ER)+/Basal tumors have relatively high levels of the dominant-negative ERΔ7 splice variant, consequences for response to adjuvant therapy and clinical outcome were unknown in those cases.[15]

  • We have examined the expression of total ER and ER variants mRNA in ER+/Basal breast cancer patients enrolled in the prospective neoadjuvant NBRST registry trial (NCT01479101) and compared these expression values to patients with ER+/Luminal B breast cancer

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Diagnostic testing of breast cancers for hormone receptor (HR)and HER2 status by immunohistochemistry and/or in-situ hybridization is routinely performed as an integral step to clinically define tumor characteristics and predict tumor behavior.[1,2] Advancement of technology has made it possible to molecularly characterize these tumors at the genomic level by evaluating underlying and intrinsic differences in tumor biology.[3,4] clinical subtypes overlap with these molecular subtypes, a significant number of patients will be reclassified based on the functionality of molecular pathways.[5,6] This reclassification may have important consequences for treatment allocation, response and clinical outcome. 1234567890():,; normalized total ERα mRNA expression complete response rates to neoadjuvant therapy and 3-year follow-up data for both patient groups within the NBRST trial and compared those to ER−/Basal breast cancer patients.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.