Abstract

This paper is concerned with the application of the strip yield models implemented in NASGRO to estimate fatigue crack growth under random loading. The two different strip yield model options (constant constraint-loss (CCL) and variable constraint-loss (VCL)) implemented in the software are considered and compared. In addition, three crack grow rate relations, obtained from constant amplitude data, the NASGRO material database and the literature, were also considered and compared. The capacity of the models to estimate the fatigue life and variability is analyzed by comparing simulated results with experimental data of fatigue crack growth under different stationary Gaussian random load processes on compact, C(T), specimens of aluminum alloy 2024-T351. The analysis performed showed that both model options provide very similar good fatigue life predictions. The estimated fatigue lives are within ±13% of the test lives with the best option. The variability of the results due to the randomness of the load is also analyzed. In this case, the variable constraint-loss option provides better estimation than the constant constraint-loss option.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call