Abstract
We study the sample estimation risk of the traditional Sharpe ratio without the restrictive assumption of normality for return series. We derive analytical results for the approximate bias and variance of the sample Sharpe ratio in terms of the underlying distribution parameters. The results clarify several misinterpretations existing in the literature. A Monte Carlo study shows that our bias and variance formulae approximate the true moments of the sample Sharpe ratio remarkably well. We propose using the analytical results to design an estimation risk-adjusted Sharpe ratio. An empirical study of mutual fund performance shows that using the adjusted Sharpe ratio gives a quite different performance ranking of those traditionally top-ranked funds.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.