Abstract

The buffy coat/dark ground phase contrast technique (BCT) and an indirect antibody enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) were employed to assess the trypanosomal status of 32 N’Dama cattle, aged 19–28 months, exposed to natural challenge of Glossina morsitans submorsitans and G. palpalis gambiensis. Prior to the start of the investigation animals experienced 9–16 months of tsetse challenge in the study area. Blood and corresponding serum samples were examined monthly for a period of 8 months for patent parasitaemia by BCT and presence of Trypanosoma vivax and T. congolense antibodies by ELISA. In the ELISA, the reactivity of sera to anti-trypanosomal antibodies was expressed in percent positivity (pp). Packed cell volumes (PCV) and body weights were also recorded monthly, and daily weight gain (DWG) computed to assess the impact of trypanosomal status on health and productivity. During the study period, the overall parasitaemic trypanosome prevalence was 3% (6/199), while the serological prevalence was 54.7% (109/199). Both diagnostic tests revealed a predominance of T. vivax over T. congolense infections in N’Dama cattle. Sensitivity of the immunoassay was 83.3%. In T. vivax-parasitaemic cattle, antibodies persisted for 4–6 months after the parasite was detected by BCT. A significantly higher overall mean PCV level was observed in blood samples obtained from cattle found, in any particular month, negative by BCT and ELISA, compared with those blood samples from animals responding serologically positively for anti-trypanosome antibodies. Likewise, mean DWG was significantly higher in cattle found negative for both tests in comparison to animals presenting detectable anti-trypanosome antibodies and those detected positive by both tests. A significant negative relationship was observed between pp values and PCV levels in animals seropositive for T. vivax and/or T. congolense. Similarly, a negative relationship was observed between DWGs and pp values. PCV levels were significantly positively correlated with DWGs. It was concluded that serological screening could provide useful information complementary to that obtained by the use of BCT not only to assess more accurately the trypanosomal status of cattle populations, but also to evaluate the effects of trypanosome infection on animal health and productivity and estimate the trypanosomosis risk.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.