Abstract
Species richness is one of the most important indices ofbiodiversity, but assessing true species richness is no easy task. In this study, we tried to determine the best estimator among seven estimators: ACE, ICE, Chaol, Chao2, Jackl, Jack2, and Bootstrap methods. A total of 7,579 samplings in two census fields, Motooka and Ino, were performed during 2000 2002. Weestablished eight survey sites. Sixty-one and 56 leafhopper species were collected at Motoola and Ino, respectively. Because the standard deviations of penultimate observed species richness were zero at the six sites, such observed species richness was regarded as true species richness. Although most of the estimators were not consistent with the true species richness, ICE was the most appropriate method to estimate the true species richness. Correlation between the true species richness of leafhoppers and the observed species richness of tree species or tree + grass species was highly significant.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.