Abstract

To determine the accuracy of semiautomated CT volumetry using portal vein (PV) segmentation to estimate volume of the right posterior section (RPS) graft compared to intraoperative measured weight (W) in live liver donors. Among 23 donors who donated RPS grafts for liver transplantation in our institution from April 2003 to August 2016, 17 donors with CT scans within 3 months of liver procurement and PV anatomy of type I-III were included. RPS volumes were retrospectively evaluated by semiautomated CT volumetry (RPSVCTV) and by measurement of standard liver volume (SLV) and PV area ratio (RPSVSLV). RPS volumes were compared to W for correlation coefficients, (absolute) difference, and (absolute) percentage deviation. Linear fitting was performed to identify the method that yielded the greatest correlation with W. Mean values of RPSVCTV, RPSVSLV, and W were 503.4 ± 97.8 mL (346.6-686.0), 516.54 ± 146.20 (274.06-776.32), and 518.8 ± 122.4 (370.0-789.0), respectively. RPSVCTV was strongly correlated with W (r = 0.9414; p < 0.0001), whereas RPSVSLV was only moderately did (r = 0.5899; p = 0.0127). RPSVCTV showed a significantly smaller absolute difference (35.20 ± 30.82 vs. 104.79 ± 60.27, p = 0.004) and absolute percentage deviation (6.61 ± 4.90 vs. 19.92 ± 10.37, p < 0.0001) from W. Equation correlating RPSVCTV and W was W = -74.7191 + 1.1791 RPSVCTV (R2 = 0.8862; p < 0.001). RPSVCTV yields smaller absolute difference than RPSVSLV for estimating intraoperative measured weight of RPS in live liver donors. Semiautomated CT volumetry using PV segmentation is feasible for the estimation of the volume of the RPS of the liver, and RPSVCTV was strongly correlated with W (r = 0.9414; p < 0.0001).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call