Abstract

The pyroelectric coefficient of some Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 type ceramics was estimated using two methods: a direct method, based on the temperature dependence of the charge/current generated by pyroelectric effect; an indirect method based on the frequency dependence of the pyroelectric signal generated by a pyroelectric element under modulated irradiation with infrared light. The purpose was to compare the results and to assess if the indirect method is enough accurate for rapid estimation of the pyroelectric coefficient of a material envisaged for infrared detection. The direct method is more accurate and requires accurate control of temperature and heating rate, while the indirect method is less accurate, with an error up to 20%, and requires the knowledge of quantities such as dielectric constant, electric conductance, and incident power. However, the indirect method can be more easily implemented and can provide a rapid assessment on the pyroelectric quality of a material with potential use in infrared detectors.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call