Abstract

This study investigated the degree to which instrumental measurements explain the variation in pork loin tenderness as assessed by the sensory evaluation of trained panelists. Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS) had a significant relationship with the sensory tenderness variables, such as softness, initial tenderness, chewiness, and rate of breakdown. In a regression analysis, WBS could account variations in these sensory variables, though only to a limited proportion of variation. On the other hand, three parameters from texture profile analysis (TPA)—hardness, gumminess, and chewiness—were significantly correlated with all sensory evaluation variables. In particular, from the result of stepwise regression analysis, TPA hardness alone explained over 15% of variation in all sensory evaluation variables, with the exception of perceptible residue. Based on these results, TPA analysis was found to be better than WBS measurement, with the TPA parameter hardness likely to prove particularly useful, in terms of predicting pork loin tenderness as rated by trained panelists. However, sensory evaluation should be conducted to investigate practical pork tenderness perceived by consumer, because both instrumental measurements could explain only a small portion (less than 20%) of the variability in sensory evaluation.

Highlights

  • This study investigated the degree to which instrumental measurements explain the variation in pork loin tenderness as assessed by the sensory evaluation of trained panelists

  • Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS) had the highest coefficient of variation (31.48%)

  • WBS was significantly correlated with the sensory results were similar to the study on beef tenderness in evaluation variables directly related to pork loin tenderness: which WBS predicted only those sensory variables directly softness, initial tenderness, chewiness, and rate of related to beef tenderness (hardness and number of breakdown (Table 3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study investigated the degree to which instrumental measurements explain the variation in pork loin tenderness as assessed by the sensory evaluation of trained panelists. WBS produced significant regression models for the has two organoleptic components: i) the impression of sensory variables softness, initial tenderness, chewiness and wetness during initial chews due to the rapid release of meat rate of breakdown (Table 4) but could not predict fluid and ii) sustained juiciness due to the stimulatory effect perceptible residue, juiciness or mouth coating.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call