Abstract

The most commonly used data for reservoir description are well and seismic data. Well data such as logs typically provide sufficient vertical resolution but leave a large space between the wells. Three-dimensional seismic data, on the other hand, can provide more detailed reservoir characterization between wells. However, the vertical resolution of seismic data is poor compared with that of well data. Conventionally, seismic data have been used to delineate reservoir structure; however, seismic data can be used for reservoir characterization such as porosity. Therefore, we can combine these two types of data to obtain reservoir parameters such as porosity and saturation. It is available the desired parameter (such as porosity) of the number of wells in the reservoir and seismic cube. And we are looking for the parameter estimation in the whole reservoir. To do this, there are several methods including multiple linear regression, neural networks, and geostatistical methods. Therefore, by determining the reservoir properties and correctly estimating these parameters, optimization can be performed with fewer wells, and the costs of exploration and production are reduced. In this paper, we apply these methods on the available data for an oil field in southwest Iran to obtain the porosity in a total reservoir cube, and these methods are then compared with one another. The results clearly show the superiority of neural networks compared with the other methods in estimating the reservoir parameter. The results also show that although estimation accuracy is increased significantly with the use of the geostatistical approach, this method requires that a sufficient number of well logs, representing all the fields under investigation, be provided in order to improve the geological model obtained by the multi-attribute and neural network methods.

Highlights

  • Well logs and seismic exploration data are commonly used for the evaluation and exploration of hydrocarbon resources (Bahmaei and Hosseini 2019)

  • The simultaneous evaluation of three-dimensional seismic and well log data in modeling, inversion, analysis, and estimation is an example of these improvements

  • The 3D seismic studies for evaluating porosity in an oil field in southern Iran began with a detailed investigation of well log trace and seismic attributes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Well logs and seismic exploration data are commonly used for the evaluation and exploration of hydrocarbon resources (Bahmaei and Hosseini 2019). An important issue that is not discussed in any of the other studies is taking into account the attributes that in addition to having a logical-mathematical relationship have a significant relationship with porosity and p-wave velocity, such that they can be used in the estimation process If this significant relationship is lacking, even if seemingly good results are obtained, the estimation accuracy may be unreliable. After the interpretation of specific horizons, acoustic impedance forward modeling was performed using seismic attributes and quality control with well log data Using this model and inversion, regression methods including single attribute, multi-attribute, and neural networks were applied to estimate the porosity in certain parts of this field. The results obtained clearly showed that after removing nonphysical attributes and reanalysis, estimation greatly improved, while the coherence of the porosity estimation increased

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call