Abstract
Penman-Monteith (PM) theory is a classic method to calculate evapotranspiration (ET) of land surfaces. However, soil resistance, related to soil moisture, is always difficult to determine over a large region. In this study, we developed an ET estimation algorithm by incorporating a soil moisture index (SMI) derived from the improved surface temperature-vegetation cover feature space, denoted as the PM-SMI algorithm. The PM-SMI algorithm was compared with the triangle algorithm and another Penman-Monteith based algorithm (PM-Yuan) that calculated soil evaporation using relative humidity. The three ET algorithms are compared and validated by Bowen Ratio measurements at 12 sites in the Southern Great Plain (SGP) that were mainly covered by grassland and cropland with low vegetation cover. The results showed that the PM-SMI algorithm performs the best among the three ET algorithms both on the instantaneous scale with R <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> of 0.86, RMSE of 53.67 W/m <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> , bias of 6.83 W/m <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> and the daily scale with R <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> of 0.87, RMSE of 39.07 W/m <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> , and bias of -4.04 W/m <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> . PM-Yuan algorithm significantly underestimates ET resulting from soil evaporation and compared to triangle ET algorithm, PM-SMI is more reliable for estimation of ET over regional scale.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have