Abstract

A semi-analytical model which predicts radiance reflectance just below the water surface ( L u/ E d 0−) has been developed and used to predict the spectral variability of radiance reflectance in Lake Mälaren, Sweden. Radiance reflectance is predicted as a function of the optically active substances in the water, which include the concentrations of chlorophyll- a+phaeophytin- a, suspended particular inorganic material (SPIM), suspended particulate organic material (SPOM), and dissolved yellow substances. These substances are linked to the absorption and backscattering coefficients through a series of empirical relationships, and ultimately radiance reflectance is estimated as a function of the ratio of backscattering to absorption. Parameterization of the model, i.e. the development of the empirical relationships linking the optically active substances to the inherent optical properties (IOPs), is based on both in situ measurements and laboratory analyses. We have collected data that allowed us to examine the potential variability in radiance reflectance, as predicted by our model, due to both variations in the optically active substances, and in the model parameterization. Simulations based on a data set collected during the fall of 1997 from 12 sites, which span a large range in water quality (secchi depth 0.8–5.0 m), suggest that, with the proper parameterization, the model can accurately predict the spectra of radiance reflectance as a function of the concentration of optically active substances. Variations in the concentrations of optically active substances accounted for a large portion of the total simulated variability in radiance reflectance (i.e. that resulting from variations in parameterization and in the concentrations of optically active substances). However, the measured variability in parameterization could account for up to 50% of the total variability in simulated radiance reflectance. This suggests that variability in the model parameterization, arising from both real variability and experimental error, will limit the use of this model for interpreting remote sensing data. Nevertheless, inverse solutions of the model are able to estimate the concentrations of chlorophyll, suspended inorganic material (SPIM) and the absorption of yellow substances from measured radiance reflectance spectra The average error for the 12 sites was a −0.07 for chlorophyll, −0.15 for dissolved yellow substances (measured as the absorption at 400 nm) and 0.07 for SPIM, even though individual errors could be as great as 50%.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.