Abstract

Theoretical evaluation of elastic impedance (EI) and ray impedance (RI) reveals that RI has a more reliable dimension and is less sensitive to errors than EI. In this paper, a new measurement (I) is proposed to estimate ray impedance from the elastic impedance derived by existing techniques. The recovered I is expressed in the form of a normalization of the elastic impedance (EI), and it has the same dimension and interpretation capability as RI. Tests of these three measurements are performed on the log data of three different types of reservoir: a typical Class III marine gas sand, a Class I tight gas‐sand and an oil‐bearing sand in thin sand‐mud inter‐bedded layers. We show that RI is capable of characterizing all three types of reservoir. In particular, it appears to be more applicable than EI for characterizing tight gas sands. The cross‐plots of EI against acoustic impedance (AI) show good characterization for gas sand, but approximately linear trends are found for all three cases. I, estimated from EI, has a comparable dimension to the acoustic impedance (AI), and retains the interpretation ability of the original RI.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.