Abstract

The accurate determination of strength parameters of rocks such as uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and elastic modulus (E) using direct and laboratory methods require substantial time and cost. Therefore, the production of predictive relationships and models to forecast the UCS and E is of critical necessity in rock engineering. This study deals with the estimation of UCS and E of sandstones from petrographic characteristics by an artificial neural network (ANN) and multiple regression. For this purpose, 130 core specimens were prepared from sandstones in different locations in Iran. The specimens were tested to determine UCS, E, dry density, and porosity. Also, the petrographic studies including the determination of 11 textural and mineralogy parameters were performed on selected samples. The performance of the ANN model and regression analysis was evaluated using the criteria such as correlation coefficient (R), root mean squared error (RMSE), and variance account for (VAF). According to the ANN results, values of R, RMSE, and VAF were obtained to be 0.925, 0.089, and 97% for UCS and 0.876, 0.094, and 96% for E, respectively. In comparison, for the MLR model, the obtained R, RMSE, and VAF were 0.845, 0.101, and 95% for UCS and 0.797, 0.116, and 93% for E, respectively. A comparison between the findings illustrated that the ANN model was more suitable for forecasting the UCS and E compared with the MLR method.

Highlights

  • The uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and elastic modulus (E) of rocks are two essential and significant geomechanical factors for rock engineering projects such as tunneling, dams, rock blasting, rock slopes, rock foundations, and underground structures

  • A comparison of the results shows that the artificial neural network (ANN) performance is better than the Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and runs results closer to the actual values

  • The ANN results by the neural network were compared with the results obtained by regression analysis (MLR)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and elastic modulus (E) of rocks are two essential and significant geomechanical factors for rock engineering projects such as tunneling, dams, rock blasting, rock slopes, rock foundations, and underground structures. Sometimes providing high-quality rock specimens is a difficult task to be accomplished, especially in the case of porous, thinly bedded, foliated, weak, and weathered rocks These impeding factors encourage laboratory technicians to utilize easier methods (indirect techniques) for assessing the compressive strength of rocks. Gupta & Sharma (2012) investigated the correlation between petrographical parameters with the physical and mechanical properties of quartzites selected from the northwest Himalaya They observed that the UCS of selected rocks is strongly related (R=0.71) to the texture coefficient. Heidari et al (2013) applied the regression equations to predict the UCS and E of Jurassic sandstones They showed that textural factors such as the percentage of long contacts, packing proximity (Pp), and packing density (Pd) have the strongest correlations with most of the geoengineering parameters of selected sandstones. Khanlari et al (2016) indicated that the petrographic indexes of packing proximity and packing density can better predict the engineering properties of the Famenin conglomerates compared with the other characteristics

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call