Abstract
Novel hyperspectral indices, which are the first derivative normalized difference nitrogen index (FD-NDNI) and the first derivative ratio nitrogen vegetation index (FD-SRNI), were developed to estimate the leaf nitrogen content (LNC) of wheat. The field stress experiments were conducted with different nitrogen and water application rates across the growing season of wheat and 190 measurements were collected on canopy spectra and LNC under various treatments. The inversion models were constructed based on the dataset to evaluate the ability of various spectral indices to estimate LNC. A comparative analysis showed that the model accuracies of FD-NDNI and FD-SRNI were higher than those of other commonly used hyperspectral indices including mNDVI705, mSR, and NDVI705, which was indicated by higher R2 and lower root mean square error (RMSE) values. The least squares support vector regression (LS-SVR) and random forest regression (RFR) algorithms were then used to optimize the models constructed by FD-NDNI and FD-SRNI. The p-R2 values of the FD-NDNI_RFR and FD-SRNI_RFR models reached 0.874 and 0.872, respectively, which were higher than those of the exponential and SVR model and indicated that the RFR model was accurate. Using the RFR inversion model, remote sensing mapping for the Operative Modular Imaging Spectrometer (OMIS) image was accomplished. The remote sensing mapping of the OMIS image yielded an accuracy of R2 = 0.721 and RMSE = 0.540 for FD-NDNI and R2 = 0.720 and RMSE = 0.495 for FD-SRNI, which indicates that the similarity between the inversion value and the measured value was high. The results show that the new hyperspectral indices, i.e., FD-NDNI and FD-SRNI, are the optimal hyperspectral indices for estimating LNC and that the RFR algorithm is the preferred modeling method.
Highlights
Nitrogen content is an essential indicator of the nutritional level and health status of crops
These results indicated that first derivative normalized difference nitrogen index (FD-NDNI) and FD-SRNI were more likely to yield highly accurate leaf nitrogen content (LNC) estimations, ideal spectral indices should be obtained with good results from different remote sensing platforms
Compared to the curve-fitting and least squares support vector regression (LS-support vector machine regression (SVR)) methods, the accuracies of the prediction results were generally improved by using an random forest regression (RFR) algorithm, which is indicated by higher R2 and lower root mean square error (RMSE) values for various spectral indices (Table 4)
Summary
Nitrogen content is an essential indicator of the nutritional level and health status of crops. If the spectral indices used for the soil nitrogen estimates are constructed from derivative spectra, the background soil information could be reduced and the feature information of crop nitrogen content be more effectively extracted. The derivative spectra will be used for the construction of new spectral indices to provide a more accurate method for the hyperspectral remote sensing estimation of the leaf nitrogen content (LNC) of crops. Spectral indices are computationally simple and can reduce the impacts of interference factors and refine the target information They can be considered an optimal method for estimating the physiological and biochemical parameters of vegetation [15,16,17,18,19,20]. TThheebbaacckkggrroouunnddisistthheettrruueeccoolloorrooff tthhee OOMMIISSiimmaaggee((447777nnmmffoorrbblluuee,,555533nnmmffoorrggrreeeenn,,aanndd663388nnmmffoorrrreedd))..TThheessiixxlleevveellssooffnniittrrooggeennssttrreessss aapppplliiccaattiioonn wweerree aass ffoolllloowwss:: NN11,, 00kkgg//hhaa,, NN22,, 7755 kkgg//hhaa,, NN33,, 115500 kkgg// hhaa,, NN44 222255 kkgg//hhaa,,NN55,, 330000 kkgg//hhaa,, aannddNN66,,337755kkgg/h/ah.aT. hTehseixsilxevleevlselosf owfawteartesrtrsetsrsesasppaplipcalitcioantiownewreeares faosllfoowllos:wWs:1,W01m, 03/hma3, /Wh2a,, 2W252, m223/5hma,3W/h3a, ,5W003m, 530/h0am, W3/4h,a7,2W5 4m, 37/2h5a,mW3/5,h1a0,0W0 5m, 31/0h0a0, amn3d/Wha6, ,a1n1d25Wm6,3/1h1a2.5 m3/ha
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.