Abstract
Abstract The loss of precision in estimates of means due to variability among interviewers can be substantial for some questionnaire items and survey designs. The most commonly used methods for estimating the magnitude of this loss are inappropriate for binary items in complex surveys. This article shows how parameters from a model for variance components in binary variables (Anderson and Aitkin 1985) are related to the increased variance of population estimates. It is suggested that one of these parameters, a measure of correlation between interviewer observations on a latent variable, may be more appropriate than the intrainterviewer correlation p for measuring the magnitude of interviewer effects. This is because it is unaffected by the level of the attribute in the population, which is not true of p. Interviewer effects for a household respondent's recorded labor-force status in a random digit dial telephone survey are examined using the new model and estimation process. Small but positive effects are...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.