Abstract
The pasture probe, rising plate meter (RPM), ward height and visual assessment methods were compared for the estimation of the herbage mass of dairy pastures. The pasture probe and calibrated visual assessment were slightly more accurate than others. Visual assessment without calibration was less accurate than all other methods. There was little difference between operators of the pasture probe and RPM, but operator variation was large with visual assessment. Variation between calibrations from different days, seasons, and sites was large. Only dead material content was identified to influence this variation. Pooling of calibrations, double sampling procedures, and derivation of different calibration slopes for each day from an equation fitted to calibration data are procedures discussed for the estimation of herbage mass by farmers, advisors and researchers. Wide adoption of methods such as the pasture probe or RPM with "universal" calibrations could reduce inconsistent advice offered to farmers, and can be used with confidence. Keywords: capacitance probe, rising plate meter, visual assessment, ward height, grassland management, pasture composition, pasture assessment.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
