Abstract
The leaf area index (LAI) is an essential input parameter for quantitatively studying the energy and mass balance in soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer systems. As an active remote sensing technology, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) provides a new method to describe forest canopy LAI. This paper reviewed the primary LAI retrieval methods using point cloud data (PCD) obtained by discrete airborne LiDAR scanner (DALS), its validation scheme, and its limitations. There are two types of LAI retrieval methods based on DALS PCD, i.e., the empirical regression and the gap fraction (GF) model. In the empirical model, tree height-related variables, LiDAR penetration indexes (LPIs), and canopy cover are the most widely used proxy variables. The height-related proxies are used most frequently; however, the LPIs proved the most efficient proxy. The GF model based on the Beer-Lambert law has been proven useful to estimate LAI; however, the suitability of LPIs is site-, tree species-, and LiDAR system-dependent. In the local validation in previous studies, poor scalability of both empirical and GF models in time, space, and across different DALS systems was observed, which means that field measurements are still needed to calibrate both types of models. The method to correct the impact from the clumping effect and woody material using DALS PCD and the saturation effect for both empirical and GF models still needs further exploration. Of most importance, further work is desired to emphasize assessing the transferability of published methods to new geographic contexts, different DALS sensors, and survey characteristics, based on figuring out the influence of each factor on the LAI retrieval process using DALS PCD. In addition, from a methodological perspective, taking advantage of DALS PCD in characterizing the 3D structure of the canopy, making full use of the ability of machine learning methods in the fusion of multisource data, developing a spatiotemporal scalable model of canopy structure parameters including LAI, and using multisource and heterogeneous data are promising areas of research.
Highlights
There are four types of methods to determine the G of a canopy, i.e., the leaf angular distribution (LAD)- and observation-direction-independent method, LAD-independent hinge zenith angle (57.3◦ ), multi-directional gap fraction (GF)-based method, and “leaves” reconstruction method based on light detection and ranging (LiDAR) point cloud data (PCD)
A high correlation was found between LiDAR penetration indexes (LPIs) [44], cover related metrics [60], and leaf area index (LAI); these models constructed based on the number/intensity of different types of returns are difficult to expand between different LiDAR systems even in the same region [21]
Both empirical regression and the physical GF model rely on field data to construct or calibrate model fraught with inaccuracy [43], which reveals that discrete airborne LiDAR scanner (DALS) PCD-based LAI retrieval is unreliable for application without calibration by field measurement
Summary
Citation: Tian, L.; Qu, Y.; Qi, J. Discrete Airborne LiDAR: A Review. Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in and Jianbo Qi 3 Beijing Engineering Research Center for Global Land Remote Sensing Products, Institute of Remote Sensing Science and Engineering, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China State Forestry and Grassland Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Resources and Environmental
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.