Abstract

Anti-poverty policies for sustainable development require efficient targeting, for which appropriate poverty lines play a crucial role. In Bangladesh, official poverty lines are estimated with the implicit assumption that there are no economies of scale in household consumption with respect to household size or composition, which raises the question of the accuracy and reliability of the measurement of poverty line. We test the existence of economies of scale, estimate their size, and assess the impact of applying equivalence scale to poverty measurement, using the 2010 Household Income and Expenditure Survey data of Bangladesh. The results confirm the existence of economies of scale in household consumption. Following the model developed by Kakwani and Son, the overall index of economies of scale in household consumption is estimated around 0.85. Modified poverty lines show that under official poverty lines, the probability of being poor is high with respect to household size. The result implies that the poverty head-count ratio(HCR) for households with large number of members might be overestimated in Bangladesh, and that there may be an incentive for low income families to enlarge family size to avail of anti-poverty public transfers.

Highlights

  • This paper examines the poverty line that most anti-poverty policies are based on

  • We focus on the impact of economies of scale in household consumptions on the poverty line, which is captured by ‘equivalence scale’

  • This study tests and measures economies of scale in Bangladesh using the methodology of Kakwani and Son [12] with the modified assumption on the pure private good and household survey data of Bangladesh

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper examines the poverty line that most anti-poverty policies are based on. We focus on the impact of economies of scale in household consumptions on the poverty line, which is captured by ‘equivalence scale’. We test the existence of economies of scale, estimate their size, and assess the impact of applying equivalence scale to poverty measurement, using the 2010 Household Income and Expenditure Survey data of Bangladesh. Daley et al [13] estimate equivalence scales for eight countries including Canada, France, Israel, Poland, South Africa, Switzerland, Taiwan, and the United States with data ranging from 1999 to 2012 and they find considerable variations in economies of scale across countries Their results suggest that measuring the equivalence scales for each country is an important issue in implementing anti-poverty policies. Based on the assumption that transportation is a pure private good, we test the existence of economies of scale in household consumption, estimate the size of equivalence scale, and assess the impact of applying equivalence scale to poverty measurement in Bangladesh.

Equivalence Scale Estimation Methods
Kakwani-Son’s Model
Data and Descriptive Statistics
Empirical Model and Estimation Strategy
Estimated Economies of Scale in Bangladesh
Comparison with Previous Studies
Assessment of Impact of Household Size Economies on Poverty
Concluding Remarks
Methods
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call