Abstract

Estimating the ecotourism carrying capacity (ETCC) in protected areas (PAs) is essential for minimizing the negative impacts of ecotourism and sustainable environmental management. PAs are one of the prominent ecotourism locations and many of these areas have been created to protect biodiversity and improve human wellbeing. This study has identified and prioritized negative impacts of ecotourism in Lar national park, the Jajrud protected area with the sustainable use of natural resources, and Tangeh Vashi national natural monument. For this purpose, physical carrying capacity (PCC), real carrying capacity (RCC), and effective carrying capacity (ECC) were estimated using the ETCC model. The results indicated that due to these areas’ ecological sensitivity, the most negative impacts of ecotourism are related to the environmental-physical dimensions. In contrast, the lowest impacts have been observed in the economic-institutional dimensions. Moreover, the results revealed that the highest PCC is related to Lar national park, and the lowest PCC is associated with Tangeh Vashi natural monument. There are more tourists in the Jajrud protected area with the sustainable use of natural resources than other areas in RCC and ECC due to low levels of restrictions and legal instructions. In contrast, in Lar national park and Tangeh Vashi natural monument, due to the short duration of ecotourism in these areas (from June to October), high level of restrictions, and ecological sensitivity, the number of tourists is less than the RCC and ECC. As these areas have a limited ability to attract visitors and ecotourism, the protection of these areas requires the implementation of sustainable management to control the negative impacts of ecotourism and estimate the number of visitors.

Highlights

  • Today’s expansion of ecotourism activities on a global scale has led to physical damage, an increase in pollution, landscape degradation, the destruction of flora and fauna, water shortages, and so on, especially in natural ecosystems and protected areas (PAs) [1,2]

  • Ecological sustainability has a relevant relationship with the capacity of ecotourism destinations and tourists’ satisfaction, so inattention to this subject can lead to unsustainability in PAs

  • The results revealed that, despite the ecological sensitivity of these areas, excessive ecotourism had increased the destruction and unsustainability in the ecosystems of these areas

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Today’s expansion of ecotourism activities on a global scale has led to physical damage, an increase in pollution, landscape degradation, the destruction of flora and fauna, water shortages, and so on, especially in natural ecosystems and protected areas (PAs) [1,2]. PAs are identified as the most essential areas in the world, and many of these areas have been created as an ideal strategy to conserve biodiversity and improve human wellbeing [3,4]. PAs have various natural, historical, cultural, and ecotourism attractions and a high biological value for plants and animals [5,6]. Ecotourism as a sustainable tool in PAs leads to a balance in biodiversity conservation, economic development, and improvement in the livelihoods of local people and communities [7]. One of the goals for PAs is to protect natural resources and provide a space for environmental education and nature-based tourism activities [7,8].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call