Abstract

Several studies have been devoted to calibrate damage indices for steel and reinforced concrete members with the purpose of overcoming some of the shortcomings of the parameters currently used during seismic design. Nevertheless, there is a challenge to study and calibrate the use of such indices for the practical structural evaluation of complex structures. In this paper, an energy-based damage model for multidegree-of-freedom (MDOF) steel framed structures that accounts explicitly for the effects of cumulative plastic deformation demands is used to estimate the cyclic drift capacity of steel structures. To achieve this, seismic hazard curves are used to discuss the limitations of the maximum interstory drift demand as a performance parameter to achieve adequate damage control. Then the concept of cyclic drift capacity, which incorporates information of the influence of cumulative plastic deformation demands, is introduced as an alternative for future applications of seismic design of structures subjected to long duration ground motions.

Highlights

  • The maximum interstory drift and ductility demands are targeted as response parameters to achieve adequate structural performance of earthquake-resistant structures

  • The aim of this paper is firstly to, introduce an energy-based damage index which explicitly accounts for the effects of cumulative plastic deformation demands in steel frames, secondly, to compare demand hazard curves obtained for moment-resisting steel frames in terms of the energybased damage index and the maximum interstory drift, and to provide for the steel frames drift capacity thresholds that account for cumulative damage and that yield adequate levels of reliability

  • The results suggest that under some circumstances, an unsatisfactory design can be obtained if measures of the ground motion duration or of cumulative demands are not taken into account explicitly

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The maximum interstory drift and ductility demands are targeted as response parameters to achieve adequate structural performance of earthquake-resistant structures. Different energy-based methodologies that aim at providing earthquake-resistant structures with adequate energy dissipating capacity have been proposed [2,3,4,5], currently, the most popular response parameter worldwide for seismic design of buildings is the maximum interstory drift. The use of energy concepts during practical earthquake-resistant design requires further developments, the influence of cumulative demands should be incorporated into seismic design of structures subjected to long duration motions. A viable manner to account explicitly for cumulative plastic deformation demands is the use of a cyclic (reduced) drift capacity, which in concept is similar to the target ductility concept formulated by [6]. The aim of this paper is firstly to, introduce an energy-based damage index which explicitly accounts for the effects of cumulative plastic deformation demands in steel frames, secondly, to compare demand hazard curves obtained for moment-resisting steel frames in terms of the energybased damage index and the maximum interstory drift, and to provide for the steel frames drift capacity thresholds (denoted cyclic drift capacity) that account for cumulative damage and that yield adequate levels of reliability

Energy-Based Damage Index for Steel Framed Structures
Maximum Interstory Drift Index
Steel Moment Resisting Frames and Earthquake Ground Motion Records
Seismic Vulnerability Assessment
Incremental Dynamic Analysis and Fragility Curves
Cyclic Interstory Drift Capacity for Steel Moment Resisting Frames
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call