Abstract
Circadian variations in the proliferative activity of squamous epithelia are well known. However, circadian variations in the duration of the various cell cycle phases (S, G2 and mitosis) have been disputed. The percent labelled mitoses method, which is traditionally used to obtain duration of cell cycle phases, is poorly suited for identification of circadian variations. Therefore methods combining changes in compartment size (cell cycle phase) and cellular flux through the compartments have been used. Three different methods using such data are presented. These incorporate various simplifying assumptions that cause methodological errors. Limits for use of the different methods are indicated. The use of all three methods gives comparable and pronounced circadian variations in the duration of S and G2 phase. These results are also compatible with circadian variations in the mitotic duration, but they may also represent artefacts due to sensitivity to model errors.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
