Abstract
Abtract The utility of comparative morphology in estimating ancestry in a group that evolved iteratively is examined in a study of Globoquadrina dehiscens (upper Oligocene Miocene) and Truncorotaloides primitiva (Paleocene-middle Eocene). Gross shape of shells in axial and spiral orientations is closely comparable as is the globorotalid-like surface topography of chambers. Similar ontogenetic changes in aperture shape occur although the flap-like extension characteristic of apertures formed late in the ontogeny of G. dehiscens is absent in T. primitiva. Globoquadrina dehiscens might be interpreted as the more advanced shell because of somewhat greater compression of lateformed chambers (possibly signifying improved form resistance late in ontogeny), but to infer that it descended from T. primitiva is at variance with the stratigraphic data. These show that the taxa are in separate lineages that may have differentiated in the Paleocene. Although some systematists urge the use of comparative morphology in e...
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
