Abstract

Abstract. Aerosol characteristics can be measured with different instruments providing observations that are not trivially inter-comparable. Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) is introduced here as a method to estimate aerosol particle number size distributions from multiple simultaneous observations. The focus here in Part 1 of the work was on general aspects of EKF in the context of Differential Mobility Particle Sizer (DMPS) measurements. Additional instruments and their implementations are discussed in Part 2 of the work. University of Helsinki Multi-component Aerosol model (UHMA) is used to propagate the size distribution in time. At each observation time (10 min apart), the time evolved state is updated with the raw particle mobility distributions, measured with two DMPS systems. EKF approach was validated by calculating the bias and the standard deviation for the estimated size distributions with respect to the raw measurements. These were compared to corresponding bias and standard deviation values for particle number size distributions obtained from raw measurements by a inversion of the instrument kernel matrix method. Despite the assumptions made in the EKF implementation, EKF was found to be more accurate than the inversion of the instrument kernel matrix in terms of bias, and compatible in terms of standard deviation. Potential further improvements of the EKF implementation are discussed.

Highlights

  • Atmospheric aerosol particles have significant effects on visibility (Hand and Malm, 2007), cloud formation (McFiggans et al, 2006), atmospheric radiative transfer (Myhre, 2009), and public health (Pope and Dockery, 2006; Gurjar et al, 2010)

  • Despite the assumptions made in the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) implementation, EKF was found to be more accurate than the inversion of the instrument kernel matrix in terms of bias, and compatible in terms of standard deviation

  • Applicability of EKF in estimating particle size distributions was tested as follows

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Atmospheric aerosol particles have significant effects on visibility (Hand and Malm, 2007), cloud formation (McFiggans et al, 2006), atmospheric radiative transfer (Myhre, 2009), and public health (Pope and Dockery, 2006; Gurjar et al, 2010). According to the Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC; Forster et al, 2007), uncertainties related to the direct and indirect climate effects of aerosols are a significant uncertainty factor in the climate change assessment Both particle size and chemical composition largely determine their climatic impacts, and are important to be accurately characterized. Assumptions on aerosol particle shape, density or chemical composition are needed to obtain the best possible closure between the measurements. In this approach, the errors introduced by each instrument are not accounted

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call