Estimation of adverse events associated with P2Y12 receptor inhibitors stratified by academic research consortium for high bleeding risk criteria in acute coronary syndrome

Abstract

BackgroundThe usefulness of the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria in the selection of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors for acute coronary syndrome is unknown. This study investigated whether the selection of antiplatelet agents according to the ARC-HBR criteria could improve clinical outcomes. MethodsThis multicenter retrospective study included 1261 patients with acute coronary syndrome who received dual antiplatelet therapy, namely clopidogrel (75 mg, n = 529) or prasugrel (3.75 mg, n = 732) in addition to aspirin. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (NACE) after hospital admission, including ischemic (death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke) and bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5). Secondary outcomes were ischemic and bleeding events. For each patient, the observation period was defined as the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after admission. ResultsDuring the observation period (average: 313 days), the rate of NACE was lower in the prasugrel group than the clopidogrel group (20.6% vs. 12.6%, respectively, P < 0.01). In patients who satisfied or did not satisfy the ARC-HBR criteria, prasugrel was associated with a 3.7% and 2.1% lower incidence of NACE, respectively, versus clopidogrel. Ischemic and bleeding events were less frequent in the prasugrel group than the clopidogrel group (11.5% vs. 7.9%, respectively, P = 0.03; 10.6% vs. 5.2%, respectively, P < 0.01). The estimated incidence models for NACE suggested that the difference between clopidogrel and prasugrel was greater in patients who satisfied the ARC-HBR criteria than in those who did not. ConclusionsPrasugrel is preferable to clopidogrel regardless of the ARC-HBR.