Abstract

Different episodes of economic growth display widely varying distributional characteristics, both across countries and over time. Growth is sometimes accompanied by rising and sometimes by falling inequality. Applied economists have come to rely on the Growth Incidence Curve, which gives the quantile-specific rate of income growth over a certain period, to describe and analyze the incidence of economic growth. This paper discusses the identification conditions, and develops estimation and inference procedures for both actual and counterfactual growth incidence curves, based on general functions of the quantile potential outcome process over the space of quantiles. The paper establishes the limiting null distribution of the test statistics of interest for those general functions, and proposes resampling methods to implement inference in practice. The proposed methods are illustrated by a comparison of the growth processes in the United States and Brazil during 1995-2007. Although growth in the average real wage was disappointing in both countries, the distribution of that growth was markedly different. In the United States, wage growth was mediocre for the bottom 80 percent of the sample, but much more rapid for the top 20 percent. In Brazil, conversely, wage growth was rapid below the median, and negative at the top. As a result, inequality rose in the United States and fell markedly in Brazil.

Highlights

  • Growth episodes have displayed widely different distributional characteristics across countries and over time

  • We establish the asymptotic properties of these estimators, propose suitable test statistics, and discuss inference procedures in practice

  • Since the main objective of this paper is to study the growth incidence curve, and these questions and hypotheses are formulated for the entire Growth Incidence Curve (GIC) process, we develop inference procedures for the quantile process over the set of quantiles indexed by τ

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Growth episodes have displayed widely different distributional characteristics across countries and over time. A large literature on “pro-poor growth”and, more generally, on the incidence of economic growth processes has developed, and attracted attention among both researchers and policymakers. Over time, this literature has come to rely heavily on the Growth Incidence Curve (GIC), which describes the rate of income growth at each quantile τ ∈ (0, 1) of the (anonymous) distribution (Ravallion and Chen (2003)). It has been used to compare the distributional characteristics of growth processes both across countries and over time It has been shown to underlie changes in certain widely-used classes of poverty and inequality measures, which can be formally expressed as functionals of the GIC (Ferreira (2012))

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call