Abstract

Accurate estimation of a crop’s yield potential (Yp) is critical to addressing long-term food security via identification of the exploitable yield gap. Due to lack of field data, efforts to quantify crop yield potential typically rely on crop models. Using the ORYZA rice crop model, we sought to estimate Yp of irrigated rice for two widely used rice varieties (M-206 and CXL745) in three major US rice-producing regions that together represent some of the highest yielding rice regions of the world. Three major issues with the crop model had to be addressed to achieve acceptable simulation of Yp; first, the model simulated leaf area index (LAI) and biomass agreed poorly for all direct-seeded systems using default settings; second, cold-induced sterility and associated yield losses were poorly simulated for environments with a large diurnal temperature variation; lastly, simulated Yp was sensitive to the specified definition of physiological maturity. Except for the simulation of cold-induced sterility, all issues could be remedied within the existing model structure. In contrast, simulation of cold-induced sterility posed a continuing challenge to accurate simulation—one that will likely require changes to ORYZA's formulation. Estimates of Yp from the modified model were validated against large multi-year data sets of experimental yields covering the majority of US rice production areas. Validation showed the adjusted model simulated Yp well, with most top yields falling within 85% of Yp for both varieties (77% and 78% observed yields within 15% of Yp for CXL745 and M-206 respectively). Maximum estimated Yp was 14.3 (range of 8.2–14.5) and 14.5 (range of 8.7–15.3)tha‐1 for the Southern US and CA, respectively.

Highlights

  • By definition, yield potential (Yp) is the yield obtained when an adapted crop variety is grown under optimal conditions without limitations from water supply, nutrients, weeds, insect pests, or disease (Evans and Fischer, 1993)

  • Following protocols established for the Global Yield Gap Atlas (GYGA; www.yieldgap.org), weather stations were selected to obtain the greatest coverage of rice production area within a 100 km radius of selected stations (Figs. 1 and 2)

  • We evaluated the ramifications of this uncertainty by adjusting the development rate for the final crop stage (DVRR), for a single site/year in CA (‘Canal’ 2013)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Yield potential (Yp) is the yield obtained when an adapted crop variety is grown under optimal conditions without limitations from water supply, nutrients, weeds, insect pests, or disease (Evans and Fischer, 1993). Under these conditions, crop yield is limited only by solar radiation and temperature during the growing season. Yields from high-yielding field studies managed explicitly to eliminate all biophysical stresses, winning yields from sanctioned yield contests, and the top yielding fields amongst a population of farmers have been proposed as proxies for estimating Yp (Duvick and Cassman, 1999; Lobell et al, 2009; van Ittersum et al, 2013). The difference between actual yields and 85% of Yp has been termed the exploitable yield gap (van Ittersum et al, 2013; Connor et al, 2011)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.