Abstract
In the present paper, we compare two methods (TRIANGLE and MW) for estimating trees from incomplete distances matrices through simulations. Our results illustrate that MW performs better for recovering path-length distances whereas TRIANGLE is superior in terms of topological recovery. Recommendations are provided as to which method should be used with real experimental data
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
