Abstract

Analyzing the way of deposition of saliva stains contributes to appropriate interpretation of saliva as evidence in court, particularly in sexual assault cases. In this proof-of-concept study, we aimed to confirm the difference between drooling-derived (non-contact) saliva and licking-derived (contact) saliva and clarify whether objectively distinguishing between the two saliva is possible. To allow discrimination between these two samples, an indicator was devised where the relative Streptococcus salivarius DNA quantity was calculated by dividing the S. salivarius DNA copies by the amount of stained saliva from the same saliva sample using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and salivary α-amylase activity assays. The study findings reveal that the value of the proposed indicator of licking-derived saliva was 100-fold significantly greater than that of drooling-derived saliva (P < 0.05, Welch’s t-test). However, theoretical and technical challenges preclude the application of this indicator as a practical method. We believe that this saliva-specific bacterial DNA-based approach could allow estimation of the saliva stain deposition method.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.