Abstract

Size estimates of key populations at higher risk of HIV exposure are recognized as critical for understanding the trajectory of the HIV epidemic and planning and monitoring an effective response, especially for countries with concentrated and low epidemics such as those in Asia. To help countries estimate population sizes of key populations, global guidelines were updated in 2011 to reflect new technical developments and recent field experiences in applying these methods. In September 2013, a meeting of programme managers and experts experienced with population size estimates (PSE) for key populations was held for 13 Asian countries. This article summarizes the key results presented, shares practical lessons learnt and reviews the methodological approaches from implementing PSE in 13 countries. It is important to build capacity to collect, analyse and use PSE data; establish a technical review group; and implement a transparent, well documented process. Countries should adapt global PSE guidelines and maintain operational definitions that are more relevant and useable for country programmes. Development of methods for non-venue-based key populations requires more investment and collaborative efforts between countries and among partners.

Highlights

  • Problem: Size estimates of key populations at higher risk of HIV exposure are recognized as critical for understanding the trajectory of the HIV epidemic and planning and monitoring an effective response, especially for countries with concentrated and low epidemics such as those in Asia

  • Action: In September 2013, a meeting of programme managers and experts experienced with population size estimates (PSE) for key populations was held for 13 Asian countries

  • It is a priority of international technical agencies and development partners, including United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS),[3] World Health Organization (WHO), the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (Global Fund)[4] and the United States President’s Emergency Fund for AIDS Relief to encourage and support national AIDS programmes to collect and use these data

Read more

Summary

Method of duplication calculation

During census/enumeration MSM were asked leaving and entering hotspots where they were going to and/or coming from. Patterns of mobility were asked of key informants during mapping. Key informants were asked about number of hotspots typically visited by key population during mapping, averaged and adjusted at national level. Service providers estimated the overlap in coverage in Bangkok. Estimated 20% overlap in large district; 10% overlap in small district. Respondents were asked whether they had visited multiple sites during key population surveys. FSW, female sex workers; MSM, men who have sex with men; PWID, people who inject drugs. % of MSM survey respondents who were not exposed to intervention Not given Not given Not given. FSW: 1.82X MSW: 2.18X 1.4X institutes; and local offices for narcotics control, social hygiene and/or police

Methods commonly used
Method for determining range
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Findings
Participants of the meeting
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call