Abstract

Changes in the size and depth of sources greatly affect self-potential (SP) anomalies. Therefore, it is important to determine the location of the source accurately. In the present study, applications of the normalized full gradient (NFG) method and Euler deconvolution (EUD) were described to determine the location of the sphere-like SP body as complementary approaches to other optimization algorithms. The NFG and EUD methods were tested on synthetic, noise-free, and noisy anomalies caused by sphere-like models in two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) cases. Subsequently, the methods were applied to real field data. The importance of the present study lies in the fact that it is the first 3D application of these methods to the SP anomaly caused by the sphere-like model in the literature. In order to determine the optimum harmonic number in the NFG method, a new criterion was used instead of the usual trial-and-error method, providing more reliable selection possibilities. In a similar way, average values were used to determine the window size accurately in the EUD method. The test results of the synthetic and real field models were satisfactory. They showed that both methods are applicable to determine the location of sphere-like structures, such as ore deposits, in self-potential surveys.

Highlights

  • In the present study, 2D and 3D normalized full gradient (NFG) and Euler deconvolution (EUD) methods were used to detect the location of a 2D or 3D polarized body having a simple spherical geometry

  • There are many previous studies having 2D and 3D NFG and EUD applications to other potential field such as gravity and magnetic, the present study is the first 3D application of the proposed methods to the SP anomaly caused by the sphere-like model in the literature

  • While x- and y-directional NFG and EUD components provide the edge information, z-directional NFG and EUD methods mainly describe the center depth of the body

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The self-potential (SP) method has a variety of application in geophysics including mining (Yüngül, 1950; Paul, 1965; Essa et al, 2008; Mendonça, 2008; Fedi and Abbas, 2013; Essa and Elhussein, 2017), groundwater (Bogoslovsky and Ogivly, 1973; Revil and Jardani, 2013), and geothermal surveys (Sill, 1983; Corwin, 1990; Schima et al, 1996; Yasukawa et al, 2003). Recent methods include least-squares inversion (El-Araby, 2004; Essa et al, 2008), The NFG method has been adopted since the 1960s and is applicable when determining the singular points of potential fields (Golizdra, 1962; Strakhov, 1962; Berezkin, 1967; Strakhov et al, 1977; Mudretsova et al, 1979; Ciancara and Marcak, 1979; Berezkin, 1988; Pašteka, 1996; Pašteka, 2000; Zeng et al, 2002; Özyalın, 2003; Sındırgı et al, 2008). This method has been widely used to interpret 2D potential field data (Hou and Shi, 1986; Ebrahimzadeh Ardestani, 2004; Dondurur, 2005; Aydın, 2007, 2010; Oruç and Keskinsezer, 2008; Sındırgı et al, 2008; Aghajani et al, 2009, 2011; Fedi and Florio, 2011; Zhou, 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call