Abstract
The article provides upgrading of methodology of estimating the sustainable social and economic development on rural territories. This research required general scientific methods, such as analysis, comparison, abstract-logical, monographic and certain economic-mathematic methods. The proposed methodology is based on the method of rating estimation. As a result of such estimation rural territories were identified by types (leading, successful, developing, lagging behind, crucial) and by the level of social and economic development (sustainable, transitional, unsustainable). This methodology was approved on the rural territory of the Chelyabinsk region. For each territory total scores were calculated and corresponding ratings were given. The lowest score guarantees the highest rating. The major part of territories was included in the group of developing areas characterized by the transitional level of social and economic development (10 districts). The second place was taken by lagging behind territories with unsustainable level of social and economic development (6 districts). The Sosnovskiy municipal district is identified as the most developed one (17 scores). By this estimation the district is included in successful territories characterized by sustainable level of social and economic development. The practical importance of the research is connected with the necessity to identify trends of rural territories to move towards sustainable social and economic development and the possibility to use this information in state programs aimed at sustainable development of rural territories on municipal, regional and federal levels.
Highlights
The article provides upgrading of methodology of estimating the sustainable social and economic development on rural territories
As a result of such estimation rural territories were identified by types and by the level of social and economic development
The major part of territories was included in the group of developing areas characterized by th e transitional level of social and economic development (10 districts)
Summary
В статье представлено обоснование методики оценки устойчивого социально-экономического развития сельских территорий. Предложенная методика основана на использовании метода рейтинговых оценок. По результатам оценок сельские территории идентифицируются по типам (опережающие, преуспевающие, развивающиеся, отстающие, критические) и уровню социально-экономического развития (устойчивый, переходный, неустойчивый). Большая часть районов отнесена к группе развивающихся территорий с характерным для них переходным уровнем социально-экономического развития (10 районов). На втором месте по численности отнесенных к типу территорий – отстающие территории с неустойчивым уровнем социально-экономического развития (6 районов). Сосновский муниципальный район определен как наиболее развитый (17 баллов). По результатам оценки данный район отнесен к преуспевающим территориям с характерным для него устойчивым уровнем социально-экономического развития. Ключевые слова: устойчивое социально-экономическое развитие, сельские территории, метод рейтинговых оценок, преуспевающие территории, отстающие территории, сельский муниципальный район
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
