Abstract
The performances of heuristic algorithms are highly dependent on the parameters used, and usually difficult to determine subjectively. Thus, how to balance the relations between the qualities of the solutions and the values of the parameters has been a hot and lasting topic in the field of optimization research. This article presented a statistical method to estimate the efficient parameter values of three alternative neighborhood search techniques of simulated annealing when applied to forest spatial harvest scheduling problems, as an example. The neighborhood search techniques included: the conventional version of simulated annealing (Method1), and the swapping version (Method2) and the changing version (Method3) of 2-element optimization (2-opt) moves. Results indicated that the performances of different neighborhood search strategies highly depended on the problem size, in which the superiorities of Method2 increased from about 10% for smaller cases (400 units) to approximately 80% of larger cases (>3600 units) when compared the objective function values with Method1 and Method3. The efficient parameter values of the cooling rate (CR), the number of iterations per temperature (Ntem), and the number of iterations used for generating initial solution (Nsol) could be estimated using polynomial functions with the number of units, while the initial temperature (IT) should be estimated using exponential function, where the determination coefficient ($R^{2}$ ) of the fitted functions were all larger than 0.60 [except for Nsol and CR of Mehod1 ($R^{2}=0.32$ and 0.42), CR of Method2 ($R^{2}=0.20$ )]. The number of satisfactory solutions all increased linearly ($R^{2} > 0.85$ ) with the number of units, while the solution efficiency decreased linearly ($R^{2} > 0.30$ ). The verifications of two extra grid datasets indicated that the parameter optimization methods were valid.
Highlights
Forest planning models can optimize the spatial and temporal arrangement of forest management activities across a forest landscape to best meet a set of objectives, while satisfying variety of spatial constraints
The average harvest volume obtained using the three neighborhood search techniques of simulated annealing all revealed a wide range of values, in which the coefficient of variation (CV) among the different scenarios varied from 0.11% to 31.28%, confirming the stochastic behaviour of the algorithm
The performances of different neighborhood search strategies were sensitive to the problem size, such as Method2 located approximately 10% cases of the maximum objective function values for the 400-units, the proportion significantly increased to approximately 80% for the larger sizes (3600, 6400and 10000-units)
Summary
Forest planning models can optimize the spatial and temporal arrangement of forest management activities across a forest landscape to best meet a set of objectives (e.g., forest economic maximization, wildlife habitat preservation, and carbon sequestration), while satisfying variety of spatial constraints (e.g., clearcut adjacency restrictions). Mathematical programming techniques have not been considered suitable for solving large and complex forest planning problems, especially when the harvest unit adjacency constraints are incorporated into the planning formulations. L. Dong et al.: Estimating the Efficient Parameter Values of Different Neighborhood Search Techniques of Simulated Annealing formulation [3] and generalized management unit formulation [3]. Dong et al.: Estimating the Efficient Parameter Values of Different Neighborhood Search Techniques of Simulated Annealing formulation [3] and generalized management unit formulation [3] These techniques still have substantive limitations (i.e., directly related to the problem size) when applied to large and complex combinational problems
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.