Abstract
Network events, like outages, are costly events for communication service providers (CSPs) not only because they represent lost revenue but also because of adverse effects suffered by the CSP’s customers. Quantifying the effect of negative events on certain key performance indicators allows the CSP to measure the network resources impacted, to provide data for a more robust revenue assurance process, and to assign appropriate severity to the events. These additional insights may help optimize the resource allocation, ticketing, and troubleshooting response times. This paper presents a novel heuristic algorithm that takes advantage of the daily patterns observed in most key performance indicators of a wireless network and the stability observed in the differences between the original time series and the lagged version. The proposed algorithm uses those differences and the previous actual values to make accurate predictions of time-series traffic volume data that represent the estimated effect of a wireless network event. The performance of the algorithm is compared with that of the state-of-the-art autoregressive, integrated, moving average (ARIMA) model and the results are reported. The proposed algorithm has reduced standard deviation in error percentage by 4.8 percentage points, has no negative bias, and executes 97% faster than the ARIMA model. The algorithm provides an accurate methodology for online or batch network event impact estimation that could potentially be implemented in traditional relational database management systems (SQL) or Big Data environments.
Highlights
Understanding the effects of certain wireless network events allows communication service providers (CSPs) to drive initiatives that minimize the adverse effects of service impacting events on the overall experience of Communication service provider (CSP) customers
The mean error percentage of the models were slightly different at − 0.21% and 0.53% for the ARIMA model and delta algorithm, respectively
The standard deviation indicates that the ARIMA model has a much larger spread of variation at 13.99% compared with the delta algorithm at 9.19%
Summary
Understanding the effects of certain wireless network events (i.e., network service disruptions, network outages) allows communication service providers (CSPs) to drive initiatives that minimize the adverse effects of service impacting events on the overall experience of CSP customers. The estimated effect of service degrading events can be used to prioritize the repair efforts of operational teams when simultaneous events happen. The same impact information can be used to determine the loss of wireless network usage during events, which can be categorized into severity levels that drive the urgency of repair efforts for the individual events. The challenge of estimating the effect of wireless network events involves calculating the difference between (1) the expected system behavior under normal conditions and (2) the real behavior observed during the network event. The delta algorithm can be used to detect an anomalous event and to accurately estimate the normal conditions for a particular set of service metrics. The network event effect is calculated by comparing the algorithm-estimated expected values with the observed values during the event. The purpose of the paper is to demonstrate that the delta algorithm is a more accurate, unbiased, and a faster alternative than the state-of-the-art ARIMA
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.