Abstract
Two methods of sampling stemwood nutrients have been compared on 10 Pinus pinaster (Ait.) trees: the increment borer method (non-destructive but producing samples which are not weighed according to the tissues' proportion) and the disc method (destructive but producing weighed samples). The samples were divided into sapwood and heartwood, and nutrient concentrations were determined for major nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg). Compared with the disc sampling method, the increment borer sampling method significantly underestimated N, P and K concentration in sapwood, whereas it overestimated Ca and Mg concentration in heartwood. The mean error ranged from −13 per cent (N and P in sapwood) to +14 per cent (Ca in heartwood). These results were in agreement with previous studies which showed horizontal variations in the nutrient concentration of stemwood.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
