Abstract

Newly developed sensors, including the EnviroSCAN capacitance system have the potential to monitor andestimate soil moisture content continuously at various depths. A simple site calibration of the sensors is required to obtainaccurate soil water content because these sensors are shipped with a default (uncalibrated) equation to the user. Therefore,our research objectives were: 1) to calibrate the EnviroSCAN capacitance system versus soil moisture values estimated bya neutron probe calibrated with gravimetrically measured water contents, then 2) statistically compare the calibrated soilwater content results with those estimated by the uncalibrated equation using three years of field data. Both the EnviroSCANcapacitance and the neutron probe were installed in a Warden silt loam soil planted to alfalfa. The average water contentsof the soil profile estimated by the EnviroSCAN capacitance was used to develop a site specific calibration equation bycomparing the sensors scaled frequencies for 1998 with the soil water content of the neutron probe. The site calibrationequation was then statistically validated using both 1999 and 2000 soil water contents. The statistical analyses indicated thatdiscrepancies existed between soil water contents of the site calibration equation and those estimated by the uncalibratedequation. For instance, the RRMSE values of soil water content produced from the calibrated equation were 7%, 41%, and40%, compared with uncalibrated RRMSE values of 68%, 59%, and 66%, for 1998, 1999, and 2000, respectively. Theseresults support that the site calibration equation was found to give more accurate estimates of individual values (low RRMSE)of volumetric soil water content compared to those obtained from the uncalibrated equation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call