Estimating relative crop yield loss resulting from herbicide damage using crop ground cover or rated stunting, with maize and sethoxydim as a case study

Abstract

The research goal was to determine whether crop damage from herbicides measured early in the growing season soon after treatment could be used to estimate relative crop yield loss. Percentage stunting was rated visually and percentage crop ground cover (i.e. percentage of the ground surface covered by vegetation) was determined from video photographs taken 2–4 weeks after sethoxydim‐susceptible maize (Zea mays L.) was sprayed with sethoxydim at various rates plus crop oil concentrate. Averaged over 3 years, relative percentage maize yield was a negative sigmoidal function of relative sethoxydim rates from 0.065× to 0.5×, where the 1× rate was 420 g a.i. ha−1 (r2 = 0.80). Relative maize yield was positively linearly related to percentage crop ground cover and negatively linearly related to rated percentage stunting averaged over 3 years. Linear regression models of relative maize yield vs. percentage maize ground cover explained only slightly more data variability (r2 = 0.86) than did rated stunting (r2 = 0.82) over 3 years. The advantages and disadvantages of rated stunting and crop ground cover as scientific measurements are discussed.