Abstract

Methods for estimating the qPCR amplification efficiency E from data for single reactions are tested on six multireplicate datasets, with emphasis on their performance as a function of the range of cycles n1–n2 included in the analysis. The two-parameter exponential growth (EG) model that has been relied upon almost exclusively does not allow for the decline of E(n) with increasing cycle number n through the growth region and accordingly gives low-biased estimates. Further, the standard procedure of “baselining”—separately estimating and subtracting a baseline before analysis—leads to reduced precision. The three-parameter logistic model (LRE) does allow for such decline and includes a parameter E0 that represents E through the baseline region. Several four-parameter extensions of this model that accommodate some asymmetry in the growth profiles but still retain the significance of E0 are tested against the LRE and EG models. The recursion method of Carr and Moore also describes a declining E(n) but tacitly assumes E0 = 2 in the baseline region. Two modifications that permit varying E0 are tested, as well as a recursion method that directly fits E(n) to a sigmoidal function. All but the last of these can give E0 estimates that agree fairly well with calibration-based estimates but perform best when the calculations are extended to only about one cycle below the first-derivative maximum (FDM). The LRE model performs as well as any of the four-parameter forms and is easier to use. Its proper implementation requires fitting to it plus a suitable baseline function, which typically requires four–six adjustable parameters in a nonlinear least-squares fit.

Highlights

  • The baselines vary from constant or sloping, to the saturation form of Equation (11). All of these properties can affect the quality of the nonlinear least squares (NLS) fits to the models being compared here

  • The standard approaches for estimating Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) amplification efficiency from singlereaction data have relied on the two-parameter exponential growth model of Equation (1), with various ways of treating the baseline and selecting the cycle range for the AE estimation

  • I have examined several models that allow for reasonable decline of E(n) in the growth region: (1) the three-parameter LRE model [21,24], (2) four four-parameter extensions of LRE that preserve the physical significance of E0 as the AE through the baseline region, (3) two four-parameter modifications of the recursion method of Carr and Moore [22] that permit estimation of E0 6= 2 in the baseline region, and (4) a four-parameter recursion method that fits directly to a sigmoidal E(n) function

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The standard curve plots of quantification cycle Cq vs the logarithm of the template number (N0 ) are ideally linear, with slope −1/log(E), where E is the amplification efficiency (AE). Recommendations for producing such curves involve three or more replicates at each of the five–seven concentrations for unknown estimation, or even more concentrations if the AE is to be estimated [4,5,6]. This procedure could entail at least 15 and as many as ~30 individual

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call