Abstract

Abstract. The use of ground-based precipitation measurements in radar precipitation estimation is well known in radar hydrology. However, the approach of using gauged precipitation and near-surface air temperature observations to improve radar precipitation estimates in cold climates is much less common. In cold climates, precipitation is in the form of snow, rain or a mixture of the two phases. Air temperature is intrinsic to the phase of the precipitation and could therefore be a possible covariate in the models used to ascertain radar precipitation estimates. In the present study, we investigate the use of air temperature within a non-parametric predictive framework to improve radar precipitation estimation for cold climates. A non-parametric predictive model is constructed with radar precipitation rate and air temperature as predictor variables and gauge precipitation as an observed response using a k nearest neighbour (k-nn) regression estimator. The relative importance of the two predictors is ascertained using an information theory-based weighting. Four years (2011–2015) of hourly radar precipitation rates from the Norwegian national radar network over the Oslo region, hourly gauged precipitation from 68 gauges and gridded observational air temperatures were used to formulate the predictive model, hence making our investigation possible. Gauged precipitation data were corrected for wind-induced under-catch before using them as true observed response. The predictive model with air temperature as an added covariate reduces root-mean-square error (RMSE) by up to 15 % compared to the model that uses radar precipitation rate as the sole predictor. More than 80 % of gauge locations in the study area showed improvement with the new method. Further, the associated impact of air temperature became insignificant at more than 85 % of gauge locations when the near-surface air temperature was warmer than 10 ∘C, which indicates that the partial dependence of precipitation on air temperature is most useful for colder temperatures.

Highlights

  • Hydrological applications require accurate precipitation estimates at the catchment scale (Beven, 2012; Kirchner, 2009)

  • It can be seen that partial weight of the radar precipitation rate is equal to 1 for nearly 13 % of the gauge locations, and the partial weight associated with air temperature is zero

  • We show that using nearsurface air temperature as a second predictor variable in a non-parametric k nearest neighbour (k-nn) method reduces the root-mean-square error (RMSE) significantly compared to a k-nn model with the radar precipitation rate as a single predictor and compared to the original hourly radar precipitation rates

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hydrological applications require accurate precipitation estimates at the catchment scale (Beven, 2012; Kirchner, 2009). Weather radars measure the precipitation rate indirectly, using the energy backscattered by hydrometeors in the volume illuminated by a transmitted electromagnetic beam (Villarini and Krajewski, 2010a). The backscattered energy is measured as reflectivity which is used to estimate precipitation (Hong and Gourley, 2015). Some of the known errors in the reflectivity measurement are ground clutter, beam blocking, anomalous propagation, bright band, hail and attenuation (Berne and Krajewski, 2013; Chumchean et al, 2003). Due to the presence of such significant errors (both random and systematic), radar data are still not widely used in hydrological applications (Berne and Krajewski, 2013; Chumchean et al, 2003). Many studies (e.g. Abdella, 2016; Villarini et al, 2008; Ciach et al, 2007; Chumchean et al, 2006) have focused on estimating these errors in order to improve quantitative radar precipi-

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call