Abstract
Abstract Despite their importance for the evaluation of criminological theories, little attention has been given to measuring race-specific rates of criminal offending for an appreciable number of macrosocial units. For a sample of 25 citics, this paper computes and compares race-specific offending rates for robbery and assault from two alternative data sources: victims’ reports of offender's race, as recorded in the National Crime Survey's Citics Sample, and official arrest data, as compiled by the FBI. In support of Sellin's argument that each step in the disposition of a crime introduces selective biases, the convergence between the total crime rates computed from these two sources is slightly weaker than that previously reported for the NCS crime rates and crime rates based on the UCR “offenses known to the police.” The observed correlations arc stronger for blacks than for whites, especially for the offense of robbery. Finally, two structural characteristics of citics, incomc inequality and populatio...
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
