Abstract

A method is presented for estimating the error covariance of the errors in the model equations in observation space. Estimating model errors in this systematic way opens up the possibility to use data assimilation for systematic model improvement at the level of the model equations, which would be a huge step forward. This model error covariance is perhaps the hardest covariance matrix to estimate. It represents how the missing physics and errors in parametrizations manifest themselves at the scales the model can resolve.A new element is that we use an efficient particle filter to avoid the need to estimate the error covariance of the state as well, which most other data assimilation methods do require. Starting from a reasonable first estimate, the method generates new estimates iteratively during the data assimilation run, and the method is shown to converge to the correct model error matrix. We also investigate the influence of the accuracy of the observation error covariance on the estimation of the model error covariance and show that, when the observation errors are known, the model error covariance can be estimated well, but, as expected and perhaps unavoidably, the diagonal elements are estimated too low when the observation errors are estimated too high, and vice versa.

Highlights

  • Linear and linearized data assimilation (DA) rely on prescribing or accurately estimating covariance matrices, related to theGaussian assumptions on the probability densities in Bayes Theorem

  • Ad hoc methods like inflation and localization are needed to generate useful prior covariances from the sample covariance matrix (Anderson, 2007, 2009). Several issues arise when using inflation and localization, for instance how to localize for an observation that is an integral along a line

  • In the appendix we show that, at least for the particle filter we use here, these methods do not reveal new information, but they rather complicate the computation of HQHT

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Linear and linearized data assimilation (DA) rely on prescribing or accurately estimating covariance matrices, related to the (near-)Gaussian assumptions on the probability densities in Bayes Theorem. Estimation of R is very popular nowadays because it has become clear that correlations between observation errors need to be taken into account to extract most information from the observations and to obtain the best analysis (Stewart et al, 2013; Weston et al, 2014). Another issue is that the error covariances B and R should have different characteristics, such as length-scales, to be able to estimate both matrices together. A major advantage of particle filters is that the prior state error covariance does not play a role, so B does not have to be prescribed or estimated.

Estimating the model error covariance
Temporal smoothing
Convergence of the method
Spatial smoothing
The implicit equal-weights particle filter
Experiments
The importance of spatial smoothing
Sensitivity to ensemble size
Sensitivity to initial model error covariance Q0
Sensitivity to observation error covariance R
Conclusions and discussion
Convergence of the estimation method
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call