Abstract

Leaf area index (LAI) is a key biophysical variable and an ecosystem condition indicator that is measured from multiple methods. In this study, LAI was measured by a terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) and Li-Cor LAI-2200 plant canopy analyzer for understanding differences. A total of six different methods that consider leaf clumping, leaf–wood separation, and orthographic and stereographic projection were compared. A reasonable agreement among all methods for LAI estimates was observed (i.e., correlations r > 0.50). The Bayesian linear regression (BLR) approach was used to scale up the six different LAI estimates and to produce continuous field surfaces for the Oak Openings Region in northwest Ohio using Landsat TM–derived spectral vegetation indices (weighted difference vegetation index [WDVI], difference vegetation index [DVI], normalized difference vegetation index [NDVI], soil-adjusted vegetation index [SAVI], and perpendicular vegetation index 3 [PVI3]). The BLR approach provides details about the parameter uncertainties that may arise from foliage and wooden biomass and can be used for model comparisons. In this study, the TLS estimates of foliage derived by orthographic projection had the lowest residual scatter and overall model uncertainty. The deviation departure from the mean BLR estimates revealed that sparse and open areas were associated with the highest error and spatial uncertainties.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call