Abstract

BackgroundHeterogeneity in malaria exposure complicates survival analyses of vaccine efficacy trials and confounds the association between immune correlates of protection and malaria infection in longitudinal studies. Analysis may be facilitated by taking into account the variability in individual exposure levels, but it is unclear how exposure can be estimated at an individual level.Method and FindingsWe studied three cohorts (Chonyi, Junju and Ngerenya) in Kilifi District, Kenya to assess measures of malaria exposure. Prospective data were available on malaria episodes, geospatial coordinates, proximity to infected and uninfected individuals and residence in predefined malaria hotspots for 2,425 individuals. Antibody levels to the malaria antigens AMA1 and MSP1142 were available for 291 children from Junju. We calculated distance-weighted local prevalence of malaria infection within 1 km radius as a marker of individual's malaria exposure. We used multivariable modified Poisson regression model to assess the discriminatory power of these markers for malaria infection (i.e. asymptomatic parasitaemia or clinical malaria). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the discriminatory power of the models. Local malaria prevalence within 1 km radius and AMA1 and MSP1142 antibodies levels were independently associated with malaria infection. Weighted local malaria prevalence had an area under ROC curve of 0.72 (95%CI: 0.66–0.73), 0.71 (95%CI: 0.69–0.73) and 0.82 (95%CI: 0.80–0.83) among cohorts in Chonyi, Junju and Ngerenya respectively. In a small subset of children from Junju, a model incorporating weighted local malaria prevalence with AMA1 and MSP1142 antibody levels provided an AUC of 0.83 (95%CI: 0.79–0.88).ConclusionWe have proposed an approach to estimating the intensity of an individual's malaria exposure in the field. The weighted local malaria prevalence can be used as individual marker of malaria exposure in malaria vaccine trials and longitudinal studies of natural immunity to malaria.

Highlights

  • Spatial heterogeneity in malaria exposure has been described at a micro-epidemiological level at varying transmission settings [1,2]

  • The weighted local malaria prevalence can be used as individual marker of malaria exposure in malaria vaccine trials and longitudinal studies of natural immunity to malaria

  • Heterogeneity in malaria exposure may bias estimates of malaria vaccine efficacy over time in longitudinal studies [8,9]. This is predicted by simulations of populations under heterogeneous malaria exposure, where vaccine efficacy is underestimated as a consequence of heterogeneity and apparent waning of efficacy over time is seen even if vaccine protection is maintained [10]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spatial heterogeneity in malaria exposure has been described at a micro-epidemiological level at varying transmission settings [1,2]. A randomized controlled trial may ensure equal distributions of malaria exposure at the start of the trial, if the vaccine is protective the more highly susceptible individuals will experience earlier clinical malaria episodes in the control group than in the active vaccination group. Their subsequent removal from the ‘‘at risk set’’ will subsequently unsettle the comparability of vaccinees and non-vaccinees and produce inaccurate estimates of efficacy [8,9]. Analysis may be facilitated by taking into account the variability in individual exposure levels, but it is unclear how exposure can be estimated at an individual level

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call