Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to estimate the direct medical costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) using three therapeutic approaches in the Brazilian context. METHODS: We performed this economic assessment from the perspective of the Brazilian public healthcare system. The following therapeutic approaches were evaluated: meglumine antimoniate, liposomal amphotericin B, and miltefosine. Direct medical costs were estimated considering four treatment components: a) drug, b) combined medical products, c) procedures, and d) complementary tests. RESULTS: Treatment with meglumine antimoniate had the lowest average cost per patient (US$ 167.66), followed by miltefosine (US$ 259.92) in the outpatient treatment regimen. The average cost of treatment with liposomal amphotericin B was US$ 715.35 both in inpatient regimen. In all estimates, the drugs accounted for more than 60% of the total cost for each treatment approach. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the marked differences in costs between the therapeutic alternatives for ML. In addition to efficacy rates and costs related to adverse events, our data have the potential to support a complete cost-effectiveness study in the future. Complete analyses comparing costs and benefits for interventions will assist health managers in choosing drugs for ML treatment in Brazil as well as in establishing effective public health policies.

Highlights

  • The objective of this study was to estimate the direct medical costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) using three therapeutic approaches in the Brazilian context

  • We considered all patients with Mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) as eligible for liposomal amphotericin B treatment because no associated condition or comorbidity is an absolute contraindication to its use[3,30]

  • The drug component accounted for more than 60% of the total cost for each therapeutic approach: 63%, 87.5%, and 90% for meglumine antimoniate, miltefosine, and liposomal amphotericin B, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The objective of this study was to estimate the direct medical costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) using three therapeutic approaches in the Brazilian context. The following therapeutic approaches were evaluated: meglumine antimoniate, liposomal amphotericin B, and miltefosine. In Brazil, the Ministry of Health (MH) recommends the following drugs: meglumine antimoniate, liposomal and deoxycholate amphotericin B, and pentamidine[3]. The CONITEC evaluates the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness before the incorporation of the new health technology in Brazil[8,9] This process is validated by the participation of the society and members of the scientific academy through public consultation[10]. These assessments help health managers to implement a transparent decision-making process, establish priorities, and allocate resources efficiently. These are important in the treatment of neglected www.scielo.br/rsbmt I www.rsbmt.org.br

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call