Abstract

In this paper, we estimate coefficients of bankruptcy forecasting models, such as logistic and neural network models, by maximizing their discriminatory power as measured by the Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristics (AUROC) curve. A method is introduced and compared with traditional logistic and neural network models, using out-of-sample analysis, in terms of discriminatory power, information content and economic impact while we forecast bankruptcy one year ahead, two years ahead but also financial distress, which is a situation that precedes firm bankruptcy. Using US public firms over the period 1990–2015, in all, we find that training models to maximize AUROC, provides more accurate out-of-sample forecasts relative to training them with traditional methods, such as maximizing the log-likelihood function, highlighting the benefits arising by using models with maximized AUROC. Among all models, however, a neural network trained with our method is the best performing one, even when we compare it with other methods proposed in the literature to maximize AUROC. Finally, our results are more pronounced when we increase the forecasting difficulty, such as forecasting financial distress. The implementation of our method to train bankruptcy models is robust in various settings and therefore well-justified.

Highlights

  • 1.1 Background and motivationIncreased attention has been paid in recent years for the development of powerful bankruptcy forecasting models, mainly for two reasons

  • An additional analysis is performed where we compare our methodology with other methods proposed in the literature to maximize Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristics (AUROC) using the same analysis as before

  • The goal of this paper is to propose an alternative method to estimate the coefficients of bankruptcy forecasting models and logistic and neural network models which are the most popular bankruptcy models used in prior research

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1.1 Background and motivationIncreased attention has been paid in recent years for the development of powerful bankruptcy forecasting models, mainly for two reasons. For a matter of bank viability, financial stability and investor protection, it would be of great interest to develop powerful bankruptcy forecasting models, which is the aim of this paper. Commercial vendors and industry experts, such as Moody’s KMV, extensively use discriminatory power as an integral part of their validation processes, especially when comparing their newly developed models with existing ones (see for instance the RiskCalc 3.1 model in Dwyer et al 2004).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call