Abstract

Abstract. The concentration of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) is an essential parameter affecting aerosol–cloud interactions within warm clouds. Long-term CCN number concentration (NCCN) data are scarce; there are a lot more data on aerosol optical properties (AOPs). It is therefore valuable to derive parameterizations for estimating NCCN from AOP measurements. Such parameterizations have already been made, and in the present work a new parameterization is presented. The relationships between NCCN, AOPs, and size distributions were investigated based on in situ measurement data from six stations in very different environments around the world. The relationships were used for deriving a parameterization that depends on the scattering Ångström exponent (SAE), backscatter fraction (BSF), and total scattering coefficient (σsp) of PM10 particles. The analysis first showed that the dependence of NCCN on supersaturation (SS) can be described by a logarithmic fit in the range SS <1.1 %, without any theoretical reasoning. The relationship between NCCN and AOPs was parameterized as NCCN≈((286±46)SAE ln(SS/(0.093±0.006))(BSF − BSFmin) + (5.2±3.3))σsp, where BSFmin is the minimum BSF, in practice the 1st percentile of BSF data at a site to be analyzed. At the lowest supersaturations of each site (SS ≈0.1 %), the average bias, defined as the ratio of the AOP-derived and measured NCCN, varied from ∼0.7 to ∼1.9 at most sites except at a Himalayan site where the bias was >4. At SS >0.4 % the average bias ranged from ∼0.7 to ∼1.3 at most sites. For the marine-aerosol-dominated site Ascension Island the bias was higher, ∼1.4–1.9. In other words, at SS >0.4 % NCCN was estimated with an average uncertainty of approximately 30 % by using nephelometer data. The biases were mainly due to the biases in the parameterization related to the scattering Ångström exponent (SAE). The squared correlation coefficients between the AOP-derived and measured NCCN varied from ∼0.5 to ∼0.8. To study the physical explanation of the relationships between NCCN and AOPs, lognormal unimodal particle size distributions were generated and NCCN and AOPs were calculated. The simulation showed that the relationships of NCCN and AOPs are affected by the geometric mean diameter and width of the size distribution and the activation diameter. The relationships of NCCN and AOPs were similar to those of the observed ones.

Highlights

  • Aerosol–cloud interactions (ACIs) are the most significant sources of uncertainty in estimating the radiative forcing of the Earth’s climate system (e.g., Forster et al, 2007; Kerminen et al, 2012), which makes it more challenging to predictPublished by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.Y

  • On 20 June 2019 we found that the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) research facility data contained particle size distribution data from seven permanent sites and light-scattering coefficients measured with a nephelometer from 20 sites

  • In situ measurements of aerosol optical properties (AOPs), particle number size distributions (PNSDs), and number concentration (NCCN) were conducted at SMEAR II in Finland, SORPES in China, and four ARM Climate Research Facility (ACRF) sites (Mather and Voyles, 2013)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Aerosol–cloud interactions (ACIs) are the most significant sources of uncertainty in estimating the radiative forcing of the Earth’s climate system (e.g., Forster et al, 2007; Kerminen et al, 2012), which makes it more challenging to predictY. As an alternative to direct measurement, NCCN can be estimated from particle number size distributions and chemical composition using the Köhler equation. Several studies have investigated the relative importance of the chemical composition and particle number distributions for the estimation of NCCN (Dusek et al, 2006a; Ervens et al, 2007; Hudson, 2007; Crosbie et al, 2015). For the best of our understanding, particle number size distributions are more important in determining NCCN than aerosol chemical composition. This makes particle number size distribution measurements capable of serving as a supplement to direct CCN measurements

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.