Abstract

One of the targets of personalized medicine is to provide treatment recommendations using patient characteristics. We present the command ptr, which both predicts a personalized treatment recommendation algorithm and evaluates its effectiveness versus an alternative regime, using randomized trial data. The command allows for multiple (continuous or categorical) biomarkers and a binary or continuous outcome. Confidence intervals for the evaluation parameter are provided using bootstrap resampling.

Highlights

  • One of the goals of the modern paradigm of “personalized medicine” is to use data collected on a patient to recommend treatment, rather than treating all patients with the same therapy

  • In the following two sections, we describe two estimates of θ: a nonparametric inverse probability weighted (IPW) estimate and the more efficient augmented inverse probability weighted (AIPW) estimate

  • We explained how a personalized treatment recommendation (PTR) can be estimated and evaluated using data retrospectively collected from two-armed randomized controlled trials. We implemented this theory in a package: ptr

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the goals of the modern paradigm of “personalized medicine” is to use data collected on a patient to recommend treatment, rather than treating all patients with the same therapy. Estimating a PTR differs from diagnostic or prognostic model development because the object of the inference (whether a patient benefited from treatment) remains strictly unobserved. Once a PTR has been estimated, it is of interest to know whether it improves on a conservative policy, for example, one where everybody is treated. This potential improvement can be estimated prospectively using a new trial, or it can be done retrospectively using a separate dataset from the one used to develop the model. We demonstrate the community-contributed ptr command to first estimate a PTR using regression modeling and to separately estimate the benefit of a PTR compared with an alternative policy, using retrospectively collected data. The command is implemented in the context of a two-armed, randomized controlled trial with a single treatment decision, a binary treatment, and continuous or binary outcomes

Notation and preliminaries
Estimating a PTR using regression
Improvement under a PTR
IPW estimate
AIPW estimate
Inference for improvement parameter
Estimating and evaluating a PTR for a binary outcome
The ptr command
Continuous outcome
Binary outcome
Discussion
10 References
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call