Abstract

The development of multiple paleotemperature proxies over the last twenty years has led to an increasing number of coseismic temperature measurements collected across a variety of faults. Here we present the first compilation of coseismic temperature rise measurements and frictional energy estimates to investigate the contribution of frictional heating to the earthquake energy budget and how this varies over different fault and earthquake properties. This compilation demonstrates that there is no clear relationship between coseismic temperature and displacement or thickness of the principal slip zone. Coseismic temperature rise increases with the depth of faulting until ~5 km and below this depth temperature rise remains relatively constant. Frictional energy, similarly, increases with depth until ~5km. However, frictional energy is remarkably similar across all of the faults studied here, with most falling below 45 MJ/m2. Our results suggest that dynamic weakening mechanisms may limit frictional energy during coseismic slip. We also demonstrate a basic difference between small and large earthquakes by comparing frictional energy to other components of the earthquake energy budget. The energy budget for small earthquakes (<1-10 m of displacement) is dominated by frictional energy, while in large events (>1-10 m of displacement), frictional, radiated, and fracture energy contribute somewhat equally to the earthquake energy budget.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.